• EI
  • Scopus
  • 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020

四个中国培育品种牛肉涮制适口性研究

郎玉苗, 李敬, 王勇峰, 刘亚娜, 孙宝忠, 李海鹏, 曹晖, 韩明山

郎玉苗, 李敬, 王勇峰, 刘亚娜, 孙宝忠, 李海鹏, 曹晖, 韩明山. 四个中国培育品种牛肉涮制适口性研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2016, (11): 72-75. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2016.11.006
引用本文: 郎玉苗, 李敬, 王勇峰, 刘亚娜, 孙宝忠, 李海鹏, 曹晖, 韩明山. 四个中国培育品种牛肉涮制适口性研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2016, (11): 72-75. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2016.11.006
LANG Yu-miao, LI Jing, WANG Yong-feng, LIU Ya-na, SUN Bao-zhong, LI Hai-peng, CAO Hui, HAN Ming-shan. Study on Chinese instant- boiled beef and suitability of beef from four Chinese cultivated breeds[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2016, (11): 72-75. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2016.11.006
Citation: LANG Yu-miao, LI Jing, WANG Yong-feng, LIU Ya-na, SUN Bao-zhong, LI Hai-peng, CAO Hui, HAN Ming-shan. Study on Chinese instant- boiled beef and suitability of beef from four Chinese cultivated breeds[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2016, (11): 72-75. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2016.11.006

四个中国培育品种牛肉涮制适口性研究

基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金项目(31440069;31571910); 国家现代农业(肉牛牦牛)产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-38);

详细信息
    作者简介:

    郎玉苗(1984-),女,博士研究生,主要从事农产品质量与食物安全研究,E-mail:ymlang@126.com。;

    孙宝忠(1964-),男,博士,研究员,主要从事肉品质量与安全研究,E-mail:baozhongsun@163.com。;

  • 中图分类号: TS251.52

Study on Chinese instant- boiled beef and suitability of beef from four Chinese cultivated breeds

  • 摘要: 为研究中国培育品种牛肉的涮制适口性,该文对6头秦川牛12块分割部位进行了剪切力测定和消费者感官评价,建立了涮食牛肉的嫩度等级评价方法;并对65头夏南牛、中国西门塔尔牛、新疆褐牛和中国荷斯坦牛的13块分割部位的剪切力值进行了测定。结果显示:涮食牛肉的WBSF阈值为<5.13 kg(很嫩),5.14~6.83 kg(嫩),6.84~9.07 kg(中等)和>9.08 kg(韧)。采集的培育品种813个样品,作为涮食牛肉原材料,90.77%样品属于"嫩"和"很嫩"这一级别,能够满足消费者需求。研究结果为企业、餐饮合理利用牛肉提供参考。 
    Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the appropriate cooking methods for beef from four Chinese cultivated breeds.Six Qinchuan cattle( 12 cuts) were collected and used to establish tenderness grade for Chinese instant-boiled beef.Warner-Bratzler shear force( WBSF) and consumer sensory evaluation were analysed.Thirteen cuts of sixty-five cattles( Xianan cattle,Chinese Simmental cattle,Xinjiang brown cattle,and Chinese Holstein cattle) were collected and used or WBSF determination.Results showed that WBSF values < 5.13 kg,5.14~6.18 kg,6.84 ~9.07 kg,and > 9.08 kg belonged to very tender,tender,intermediate,and tough beef samples,respectively.Among 813 samples,90.77% beef belonged to“very tender”and “tender”grade of Chinese instant-boiled beef,and met consumer satisfaction.The results can provide suggestions for beef enterprise and restaurant to use beef reasonably.
  • [1] 国家畜禽遗传资源委员会组编.中国畜禽遗传资源志:牛志[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2011.
    [2] 孙宝忠,马爱进,杨喜波,等.牛肉质量评定分级标准现状、制定原则及作用[J].中国食物与营养,2002(5):15-16.
    [3] 汤晓艳,王敏,钱永忠,等.牛肉分级标准及分级技术发展概括综述[J].食品科学,2011,32(19):288-293.
    [4] 沈振宁,高峰,李春保,等.基于计算机视觉的牛肉分级技术研究进展[J].食品工业科技,2008,29(6):304-306;309.
    [5] NY/T 676-2010牛肉等级规格[S].
    [6]

    Cho S,Kim J,Park B,et al.Assessment of meat quality properties and development of a palatability prediction model for Korean Hanwoo steer beef[J].Meat Science,2010,86(1):236-242.

    [7]

    Delgado E F,Aguiar A P,Ortega E M M,et al.Brazilian consumers’perception of tenderness of beef steaks classified by shear force and taste[J].Scientia Agrícola,2006,63(3):232-239.

    [8]

    Destefanis G,Brugiapaglia A,Barge M,et al.Relationship between beef consumer tenderness perception and WarnerBratzler shear force[J].Meat Science,2008,78(3):153-156.

    [9]

    Lepper-Blilie A,Berg E,Germolus A,et al.Consumer evaluation of palatability characteristics of a beef value-added cut compared to common retail cuts[J].Meat Science,2014,96(1):419-422.

    [10]

    Mc Kenna D R,Lorenzen C L,Pollok K D,et al.Interrelations of breed type,USDA quality grade,cooking method and degree of doneness on consumer evaluations of beef in Dallas and San Antonio,Texas,USA[J].Meat Science,2004,66(2):399-406

    [11]

    Rodas-González A,Huerta-Leidenz N,Jerez-Timaure N,et al.Establishing tenderness thresholds of Venezuelan beef steaks using consumer and trained sensory panels[J].Meat Science,2009,83(2):218-223.

    [12]

    Van Wezemael L,De Smet S,Ueland,et al.Relationships between sensory evaluations of beef tenderness,shear force measurements and consumer characteristics[J].Meat Science,2014,97(3):310-315.

    [13] 毛衍伟.牛肉食用品质保证关键控制点研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2008.
    [14] 刘娟.PACCP技术在我国牛肉烹调上的研究应用[D].南京:南京农业大学,2008.
    [15]

    Beriain M J,Sánchez M,Carr T R.A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance,purchase intention,and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios[J].Journal of Animal Science,2009,87(10):3392-3402.

    [16] NY/T 1180-2006肉嫩度的测定剪切力测定法[S].
    [17]

    Neely T,Lorenzen C,Miller R,et al.Beef customer satisfaction:role of cut,USDA quality grade,and city on in-home consumer ratings[J].Journal of Animal Science,1998,76(4):1027-1033.

    [18]

    Monsón F,Saudo C,Sierra I.Influence of breed and ageing time on the sensory meat quality and consumer acceptability in intensively reared beef[J].Meat Science,2005,71(3):471-479.

    [19]

    Killinger K M,Calkins C R,Umberger W J,et al.A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance and value of domestic beef steaks and steaks from a branded,Argentine beef program[J].Journal of Animal Science,2004,82(11):3302-3307.

    [20] 祝贺.不同等级牛肉品质特点和感官分析[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2012.
    [21]

    Boles J A,Shand P J.Effect of muscle location,fiber direction,and slice thickness on the processing characteristics and tenderness of beef stir-fry strips from the round and chuck[J].Meat Science,2008,78(4):369-374.

    [22] 郎玉苗,谢鹏,李敬,等.熟制温度及切割方式对牛排食用品质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(1):317-325.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  138
  • HTML全文浏览量:  15
  • PDF下载量:  97
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-10-13

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回